logo

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Auto Insurance Rates Zoom

Opening the Sunday paper, my eye caught the following headline.

Rates up for auto insurance

Trend follows Georgia’s passage of law that lets companies increase charges without state permission.


So now the carriers can increase rates at will with impunity.

At least that is the implication.

Many Georgia motorists have seen auto insurance rates rise this year, and the increases have accelerated since a new state law went into effect allowing companies to raise premiums without first getting state approval.

Until recently, auto insurance carriers had to first file rates with the DOI and wait for approval before the rates could go into effect. That changed in October when carriers were allowed to file rates without prior approval.

Since the Georgia law went into effect Oct. 1, many companies have filed to raise rates 5 percent to 10 percent. A few drivers considered more risky could see their bills jump as much as 81 percent.

So "risky" drivers are being asked to pay more.

I suppose this is unfair.

Not the way I see it. Why should I have to pay a higher rate just because someone else chooses to drive recklessly?

My good driving record should stand on its' own merit and those with bad driving records should be made to pay more.

Eddie Baker, director of building services at a Macon hospital, said he was surprised when his auto insurance came up for renewal earlier this year and his company raised the rate 27 percent. So he shopped around and switched companies.

Sounds like the free market it working.

If you don't like the rate, see if you can find a better one.

So what's the beef?

Hubert Welborn, a Warner Robins retiree on a fixed income, said his rates almost doubled this year when he turned 75.

Isn't most everyone on a fixed income?

Most folks work for a salary, or an hourly wage. They make the same each week (barring working more or fewer hours is you are compensated hourly).

Welborn couldn’t find a better deal elsewhere, so he increased his deductibles —- the amount he would pay out of pocket in case of an accident —- and stayed with the same company. That cut the cost of his coverage.

This is risk management.

“I have been involved in insurance regulation for 30 years,” Klein said. “I really have not seen any benefits to requiring prior [state] approval of rates. Competition in these markets is relatively fierce. That’s going to, by itself, regulate a company’s pricing.”

This is what you call a "duh" moment.

Dr. P.C.

Don't have a doc?

Don't have time to see a doc?

How about an online doc?

Now you can make an appointment, talk to or correspond with your doc via email all from the comfort of your home . . . or coffee shop.

For a monthly membership fee of $35, you can have a doc at your beck and call.

Prices are clearly marked on the site.

No surprises.

And, on top of being accessible and affordable, we focus on you, as a real live, busy person.

We can do all that because we love technology, the Internet, and especially our iPhones


An iPhone doc.

Imagine that.

Friday, December 5, 2008

Pay As You Go© Insurance?

Let me state at the outset that I am not a fan of American Community Mutual Insurance Company (ACM). Some years ago, we parted ways over an ethics issue: I had ethics, they did not. I have no idea whether or not that's changed, and I have no desire to find out.
However, this is an insurance blog [ed: nice of you to notice, Mr Swedish health care basher], and ACM is rolling out a new product which may have some value. Called "Community Flex," it starts out as an accident policy (major claims are only paid for injury, not illness), with some coverage for doc visits, preventive care, and a drug discount card. A rider is also available for maternity coverage (no word on whether that must be "accidental," too).
A two year rate guarantee is available for folks who choose higher deductibles ($5,000 and up).
Now, if you want more coverage, such is available through a "Gold Plan" buy-up. This gets you coverage for more doctor's visits, more preventive care, and better prescription drug coverage.
Perhaps I'm missing something here, but does anyone else notice a big, glaring hole?
A free, one-year's paid subscription to IB for the first person to call it.
UPDATE: Please click here for the latest on this product.

Sad News

Medical Mutual of Ohio (formerly Blue Cross of Ohio) doesn't get a lot of pixels here: they're not a large carrier, and haven't done much to either tick us off or make us shout "hurrah!" But they are part of our industry, and I just learned that their CEO, Kent Clapp, was killed in a plane crash this past Wednesday (the 3rd).
Kent was only 62 years old when he died. According to the carrier's website, he was a philanthropist who enjoyed giving back to the community: "In 2000, he was awarded the March of Dimes Franklin Delano Roosevelt Humanitarian Award, and in 2002 he was honored at the Northeast Ohio MS Society’s Dinner of Champions."
According to news reports, he was flying in a twin engine plane which crashed as he and his fiance were returning from a vacation. It was a last-minute charter flight (they had apparently missed their regular, commercial flight).
As FoIB Rick Byrnes notes, perhaps the saddest thing was this observation by company spokesman Jared Chaney:
"There is nothing that was that important...Looking back on it, he could have waited for another plane."
Our deepest sympathies go out to his family and co-workers.

Niche Marketing or Terror Enabling?

Recently, we reported on a unique niche marketing effort aimed at the gay demographic. And, of course, other such campaigns have targeted other buyer groups. It's how businesses grow.
World Net Daily reports that disgraced insurance giant AIG is developing (has developed?) a sharia-compliant homeowners insurance policy.
[ed: "sharia" is traditional Islamic law]
These particular plans are based on the Islamic concept of "Takaful," which apparently means "mutual assistance." We've seen similar "plans" in the health area, where folks join a group and are assessed when a member has a claim. Another aspect is that the carrier will only invest in companies or funds which are "sharia-friendly:" like "green" mutual funds (which invest only in companies buying into the global warming scenario), "sharia friendly" companies would be those that (for example) don't market pork products, or tobacco and the like.
On its face, this seems pretty innocuous: a market with a need (Muslims who own homes) and a solution (niche-friendly insurance). Assuming that the plans are adequately reserved and appropriately underwritten, where's the harm?
At least one organization, Family Security Matters is concerned that such a scheme opens the door to sharia-based law here, supplanting our own legal system. Since we taxpayers now own AIG, the argument seems to be, we have a right and obligation to see that this doesn't happen. They're concerned that we now own "part of [a] company with a business that promotes an Islamic supremacist ideology that is against equality, against liberty, and in support of discrimination."
I'm not sure I see that.
According to the carrier's site, the company sees its products as "an investment in the future of socially responsible insurance." Assuming that the profits flow back to the stakeholders (that would primarily be thee and me), I'm not sure I see a problem.
There are those who will object that the carrier will market only to Moslems, and that this is blatantly discriminatory.
D'uh!
Insurance is all about discrimination: we discriminate against speeders, and people with cancer, and teenagers...the list is pretty long. USAA sells only to folks associated with the military, Lutheran Brotherhood to their co-religionists, and so on. This seems to me to be no different.
If it turns out that this new carrier is, indeed, funneling its profits to terror groups, then of course the plug will need to be pulled, and fast. But there doesn't seem to be any evidence of that, merely speculation. Still, it seems prudent to keep a watch on this, to make sure that it is simply another niche marketing scheme, and nothing more sinister.
We'll keep you posted with any new developments.

Medicare (Dis)Advantage?

Both IB reader Jeff M and the folks at the bwell blog have tipped us that the first MMA (Medicare Modernization Act) casualty may be Medicare Advantage plans. While increasingly popular, they have also "added to Medicare's complexity and costs and...created potential inequities, without apparent improvements in quality.”
Ooops.
So if these plans are on their way out, what happens to all those seniors who've come to depend on them? There are a number of options, many (most?) of which are discussed at Medicare's website. Once you've gotten an idea of what's available, we recommend consulting with a local, professional, independent agent who specializes in health coverage, and who has experience with the whole gamut of Medicare options.

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More